- This topic has 17 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
Kimani.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 23, 2013 at 4:00 am #47415
memm
ParticipantI think the problem with these types of things is that people are not black and white enough for any kind of labels to really have any weight. You can be a charmer one day and a designer the next or professional on weekdays. We’re built to adapt.
December 23, 2013 at 4:06 am #47416Kimani
ParticipantBut it’s about which one is more prevalent than others with you. It’s not like these types / disorders overlap. You are going to see yourself as one much moreso than others.
December 23, 2013 at 4:08 am #47417memm
ParticipantThat’s where I strongly disagree.
December 23, 2013 at 4:14 am #47418Kimani
ParticipantWhy?
December 23, 2013 at 4:23 am #47419memm
ParticipantWell for one thing do you really think Asperger’s can’t also be codependent? And why not withdrawn most times but when you see somebody in trouble be comforting?
It’s because what we are up against, the situations / environment defines our response / capabilities. Also things like depression can make you very numb emotionally which can make you very cold and manipulative, but at happier times when you have more empathy being sociopathic is much more difficult.
December 23, 2013 at 6:11 am #47421Matt
ParticipantKimani,
Nice work, keep exploring! I tend to agree more with memm’s observations about archetypes momentarily arising based on the conditions (including neuro-atypical brain structures that make the conditions more enduring), but your curiosity and intention of “sorting out the mess” glows.
Also consider checking out Chogyam Trungpa’s work “Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism” which helps erode the force inside that clings to these archetypes as some enduring trait, or the words we write as some enduring truth. Instead, as the Buddha taught, we are constantly in flux, and the more fluid we become, the more wisdom and joy flows through us. That’s when we can become bridge builders, instead of drawing sorting circles. Does that make sense?
With warmth,
MattJanuary 6, 2014 at 12:04 am #48467Kimani
ParticipantAs far as the Buddhist concept of following a middle path or avoiding extremes the Designer type is in the middle of the two extremes that are the Professional and the Charmer type. The Charmer type lives a life of excess and egocentricity. The Professional type does the exact opposite only living to serve others. But the Designer isn’t concerned with either of those roles.
January 10, 2014 at 1:16 am #48843David Bederman
ParticipantThe greatest benefit I received from learning Myers/Briggs and the Eneagram systems was that it helped see my “robotic” tendencies and thereby gave me a map through which to notice the limitations my personality was placing on me.
I find that using these personality typing systems is a tremendous tool for helping us grow out of old patterns and learning to achieve new goals.
Without these systems, many people stay locked in an invisible prison of personality, unable to notice their own habitual (and often times destructive, if not just limiting) patterns.
They can be a tremendous tool for personal growth!
(sorry, i didn’t really respond to the OP here. apologies)-
This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by
David Bederman.
January 11, 2014 at 6:25 am #48909Kimani
ParticipantWell do you think my personality system can be beneficial in that same way?
January 9, 2016 at 7:30 pm #91932Jordan
ParticipantHi, this is a very interesting discovery to me and I must say I am a little annoyed which I will explain, I was watching the movie Merlin (1998) and realised that Queen Mab fits the personality traits of someone with borderline (massive fear of abandonment by her religious followers) and also Narcissistic personality disorder and Machiavellianism. It kindof entered my mind that Queen Mab is a mythical creature and therefore could be an archetype, and what occured from then was some kindof of reverse logic I cant really explain it which made me come to the conclusion that people with BPD, NPD, ASPD etc must all have some archetypal drives in them. I’m entering university in January to study psychology but I have been doing my own research anyways, so what I’m trying to say here Kimani is that I came to the same conclusion as you did and then googled it and found this, which was very pleasing but at the same time I am a little annoyed you got there first, but I must say congratulations, and the fact that someone else has come to this conclusion too helps to re-affirm to myself that I am not going mad and obsessive over psychology. Thank you very much for this brilliant thread!
January 9, 2016 at 7:36 pm #91933Jordan
ParticipantWait there is a bit of cognitive dissonance in my comment there. I am mad and obsessive over psychology 🙂
June 18, 2016 at 10:44 pm #107633Kimani
ParticipantI’m glad you find this interesting. As you can see I’ve added more archetypes since I first posted here and added more questions that deal with the new archetypes.
July 8, 2016 at 12:56 pm #109170Kimani
ParticipantThe summary section of my website
July 15, 2016 at 3:32 am #109715Authorgirl
ParticipantInteresting : )
August 1, 2016 at 12:42 pm #111197Sann
ParticipantHey Kimani,
I have to admit that I didn’t read the whole topic because I am very tired, hope to read it later.
But I wanted to ask, if you have read books of Caroline Myss? At the moment I am just reading her book ‘Sacred Contracts’, which is also drawing further upon the theory of Archetypes, (but i’m not that far yet, that is why the content of your post is still quite ‘alien’ for me). So perhaps that might be interesting for you, in case you hadn’t heard of it yet.So, if i understand well, the relationship between the archetypes and the disorders is your part, that doesn’t come from Jung?
On how much sources do you base this idea?
How much study of all these disorders did you do for that?For example, can you explain me why you say that people with Borderline personality disorder, have an impulsive, manipulative nature?
I’m not trying to critisize or ridicule anything, I would like to understand more where you come from.
I might have other things to say as well, maybe when I have read more in the book to help me understand and reflect more on things.
-
This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts