Home→Forums→Share Your Truth→Is it Better to Change One String at a Time?
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 1 month ago by Peter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2017 at 11:03 am #177249Kevin MahoneyParticipant
I came across a discussion post this week that asked if it is better to change one string on a violin at a time or all of them at once. As one who has absolutely zero musical instrument experience, I had no opinion on the matter. The reason for the discussion appeared to be concern about the damage that could be done to the neck of a violin when removing the strings, all at once. The consensus seemed to be that changing all the strings at once was fine and that it was just an “old husband’s tale” (first time I heard that phrase) that said the neck of the violin would be damaged by such a change.
As I read the various responses, I could not help but see the connection to personal growth. Is it better to make one change at a time or many changes all at once? Does changing all of our “strings” at once damage us or is that just an outdated myth? One of the discussion post participants mentioned that a violin is fine when removing all the strings at once because, in reality, a violin would naturally prefer to not have any pressure from strings. It sounds like there are more similarities between people and violins than I thought.
So what do you think? Is it better for us to change one string at a time or change all of them at once?
November 11, 2017 at 4:35 am #177647Hana LParticipantChanging strings on the violin require care and being gentle, since the pegs are quite delicate 😉
In regards to personal growth, I think it depends on what we have to change within ourselves. If the magnitude of change required is larger, then making one change at a time is easier for us to focus on our progress and goals (trying to do many changes at once may overwhelm and cause more stress instead).
That being said, nowadays we do multitask more, so making a number of changes at once may not be too difficult as long as we have clarity on what we want to change I guess.
H
November 13, 2017 at 6:38 am #177903Kevin MahoneyParticipantI agree that substantial changes may be better one at a time. For me, I notice that if I am focused too long on one major change I can become overly cautious regarding smaller changes that I would be better off just making and stop thinking about it. I ssppose the opposite is also true.
November 13, 2017 at 8:48 am #177935PeterParticipantThe thought experiment of changing the violin strings is interesting. The first thing that struck me was the nature of the question and what was being asked.
Its not possible for an individual to change all the strings of a violin at once so the question needs to be clarified. Is it better to change one string as required or replace all the strings when one string needs replacing? And that is a totally different question and brings up questions on how we view change.
Regardless of the answer in both scenarios, with all strings replaced or not, all the strings would need to be adjusted. I also suspect that there is an optimal order in which the strings are replaced and adjusted so being knowledgeable and having a good ear (aware) are necessary requirements to making the change successfully. And of course the strings need to be constantly adjusted to stay in tune so change is a process that does not stop.
In the way the question was asked there was an assumption what was understood by stating that all the strings could be changed all at once. Depending on where one perceives the change you could equate the process of change as multi tasking. However if we were to watch someone change all the strings of a violin we would see them changing one string at a time. This to me begs the question what is change and how do we perceive it.
My experience of change is that change happens slowly then all at once. Meaning we are not usually aware of all the micro changes that have to take place before we notice change. Many also have the experience of everything changes and staying the same. Once a single or all the strings were replaced on the violin did the violin change?
With regards to multi tasking I personally don’t believe ego consciousness is capable of it thought the unconscious is. (in the unconscious there is no past, present or future, everything happens in the same moment.)
Ego consciousness is linear where each moment appears to be the product of cause and effect and that this creates the experience time and movement or change. Ego Consciousness divides experience into units of time and process them in that way, one at a time. Instead of multi tasking Ego Consciousness more likely does something like time division multiplexing. Meaning we direct our consciousness on a number of tasks one at a time. We may do this so quickly that it appears we are multi tasking however we are not. We are still focusing our attention on one task at a time, we are still changing one string of the violin one at a time.
I think being conscious of the illusion of multi tasking is important to the process of making changes in our lives. If we have a tendency to focus our limited attention on multiple tasks we many not notice that the first string we attach to the violin is flawed in some way. As well we may not notice that below the surface at a subconscious level many things are occurring that might influence what we hope to change. Its possible at a deep level we might really want to pick up a guitar
-
AuthorPosts