Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NateParticipant
I realized that there is an assumption in all of this that friends are necessary. I have…. to me, they feel like acquaintances because of the lack of commitment and intimacy on their end, but as I understand, this is what people consider friends, reserving commitment and intimacy for a partner or maybe family. Being estranged from my family and being completely shut out of the dating pool, I end up seeking these things in people who will never have any interest in sharing them.
So I considered whether it would be possible or even healthy to just go without. And it turns out it can be: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/comparatively-speaking/201905/why-you-dont-need-friends
The short version is that people find being able to competently provide for their own basic needs is far more crucial to happiness than friendship.
And though I crave sharing commitment and intimacy with someone, I can’t give it to people who don’t want it. So I realized that I can commit to myself and to grow in self-knowledge aka self-intimacy. I can even be romantic with myself. For instance, I inquired about getting a horse-drawn carriage ride by myself (you can!)
If the world rejects me, I still have space to nurture a rich spiritual life. If people reject me, I still have my gods and my ancestors.
I’m in a much better place than I was when I first posted. Thank you.
NateParticipantThere are very few questions I won’t answer. I’m an open-book type, I guess you could say. It’s just that the book doesn’t get opened that often.
I probably won’t talk openly about what I do in the bedroom because that is between me and my partners. Not everyone is like this, as I’ve known some who are quite open about such things.
I won’t talk much about my spiritual beliefs because they are a little idiosyncratic and deeply personal. I also worry that people will think they are silly or unsubstantiable.
I’m struggling to think of much else I won’t answer.
-
AuthorPosts